The consultant makes it so difficult the accreditation process because they want to make money.
I will always recommend the involvement of the training provider to the development of documentation because the consultant is not the one who will implement whatever is defined in the documentation. I personally experience the problem of company representative or management who is not assisting/cooperate. In that situation atleast the consultant must train the company about their documentation. It is a disgrace when the seta came for verification and training provider representation cant even respond to what is their manual.
I see no need not to be transparent about the accreditation process. Training provide also need to be curious about everything related to training. ''RESEARCH' , for example an accredited training provider but still dont know that assessor dont get accredited instead registered.
Any one can contact me regard seta accreditation