PPE that is not in the OSH act will save your employees’ lives 8

Safety first!by Jan Hollenbach

It’s sad that, yet again, the issue of incidents, accidents and fatalities in the industry have come to the fore. Many of the responses to these dilemmas have been along the lines of “we must maintain or increase our safety standards at the operation beyond what the OSH act requires”. Should we rather not upskill or empower our employees who’re involved in our operations? Having considered some of the safety training materials in many organisations – as the HR manager you should be considering this when you select safety courses for your staff – it’s made me ponder on what kind of PPE* will save a limb or a part of the body if an accident occurs.

A safety glove will protect your employees’ fingers and hands but an accident can result in them losing the hand wearing a glove or their feet wearing safety boots. They shouldn’t just wear protective clothing to be safe – their behaviour needs to be safe too!

The brain is the most important part of the body in any and all safety-related matters. It’s the brain that determines an individual’s mindset: if an employee doesn’t have the correct mindset towards safety, none of the PPE will protect him – and in fact that worker is a serious threat to all his fellow employees.

Safety policies, procedures and signage are as effective as the mindset of the individual that gets exposed to these. Would it be unfair to compare it with a 60 km/h or 120 km/h sign next to the road?

Incidents and accidents occur because people are complacent about health and safety

It’s impossible to do safety training as many times as is needed for employees not to become complacent. Reminders and signage can help to this end but the real difference will only be achieved if an individual has a safety-oriented mindset.

In the mining industry, miners need to know that the most important product that needs to come to the surface at the end of the shift is them and the other miners.

Maybe one of the solutions for a changed mindset lies in a series of conversations about values, contribution, engagement, respect and, yes, safety as well.

The nature of the relationship that the employee has with the organisation and, importantly, with his or her supervisor is of primary importance in becoming complacent. We all know that for any relationship to survive and last, a lot of effort is required. Many couples will agree – the more effort the better the relationship. Some considerations for a relationship with a positive mindset include regular – or even daily – communication, caring, trust and engagement.

The way you handle your relationships will determine the response you receive from those you have a relationship with. When last did you have a conversation? Do you know how to have REAL conversations?

Let’s get safety back where it belongs (and stop doing only what the OSH act says you must do): in the minds and behaviours of people.

* – PPE refers to ‘personal protective equipment’.

This article first appeared on HR Pulse.

Share on Social Media

Leave a comment

8 thoughts on “PPE that is not in the OSH act will save your employees’ lives

  • Lia Marus Post author

    Great – thanks very much! Our style is very conversational and not academic in the slightest. There must always be a useful take-home that readers can glean from the article. The article must be 500 – 800 words long. Could you include a pic and bio of yourself, as well as a link to a website that we can put on your author bio?

  • Lia Marus Post author

    Hi Anita. Thank you for your comments – they are very insightful. Yes please, I would love you to give me the answers to these questions – would you be interested in writing an article on HR Pulse for us?

  • Anita Hough

    Good to know people still care and wish to go the extra mile to ensure safety at all levels for their staff.  What if they do get injured? Has anybody looked at the poor service they will receive in terms of the benefits payable to them?  Why can the mining industry have a company to manage their injury on duty benefits and yet all other industries have to suffer the dismal service of the Compensation Commissioner?

    Are   your staff and management trained in the benefits and what their rights are should they ever be so unfortunate to meet with an accident?

    Perhaps I can give you  the solution as an expert in the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act?

  • Egbert van Baalen

    I fully agree with Jan’s views. As learning professionals we too often tend to focus on teaching people safety e.g OHS act, instead of training people to do their work safely e.g. minds and behaviours.