We can only stand together, support one another and share information. We all have concerns, battle with communication, getting answers……….. let’s assist and drive quality education!
Services Seta Verifiers to the RESCUE!
28th Feb 2017 at 6:35 pm #42849
Dear Skills Universe Members, I have to tell you what I have experienced in the last two days. I have read so many negative comments about the Services Seta in the last couple of months/years and frankly speaking expected to attend a verification of hell.
I was contracted by a large firm to evaluate a Learnership going back to 2011, and believe me, it was no small learnership – there were 800 learners. Various verifications were conducted and unfortunately each one had “nit picking” and beyond. I was absolutely shocked when I had to go through all the historical papers to find that these poor learners were hanging in the system for years with no outcome.
The uploads of these learners were conducted annually, proof of this was evident on various emails, spreadsheets (hard and soft copies) – but still the system has failed us.
Two Services Seta verifiers was scheduled for this visit. They were on time both days, worked through lunch, tea and worked like slaves. The only break they took, was a very quick bathroom break. The first day they started at 8:30 and left at about 18:00, today they started at 8:00 and left at 17:00 (same process, working through lunch, tea, and heads down in these portfolios non-stop).
I have been in verifications for many years, in different positions (from a Provider, Seta, Employer) and I can tell you, that these two Verifiers were absolutely quality driven, asked questions pertaining to what is required, requested documents which was clearly stated in their report and did not once give an indication of “red tape” nonsense. This is what a Verifier’s job is, to ensure that all requirements are met, evaluation is done in a respectable manner, questions are asked (and if you don’t understand, they explain exactly what they are looking for).
To the Services Seta Verifiers: Ms Nonhlanhla Xulu and Ms Ntombi Salman, thank you for showing me and this Company that quality verifications can be done, even though (in my personal opinion) you had so little support from SETA management and your IT department. This is a clear indication that you are serious about what you are doing, ensuring that quality verifications can be done, no matter the difficulties.
Give credit, when credit is due. I will be forwarding a letter of thanks and complement the two of you to the QCTO Chief Directors, as this needs to be done!
Nanhlanhla and Ntombi, keep up the good work!
28th Feb 2017 at 7:25 pm #42868
1st Mar 2017 at 5:11 am #42867
Hi Arlene, I will respond to your question. It is very important to acknowledge good work (this is not seen much these days). Clearly the industry have gone through a very bad patch, and positive feedback is always welcomed. In order to change the negative vibe that is currently our reality, let’s try to get some balance, give credit when credit is due and attempt to make a positive change!
I am drafting a response to the QCTO regarding various issues and concerns that providers have submitted, and all of this is negative. Even the QCTO will appreciate positive feedback.
I love positive feedback, when people work together, get acknowledgment for their good work, motivating and encouraging each other.
I think I have answered your question that you posed to Lynne.
Have a positive day! Kind Regards, Lynel
1st Mar 2017 at 5:12 am #42866
1st Mar 2017 at 5:21 am #42865
Hi Simone, that is absolutely awesome news. Wow, what a change from all the negative posts seen. I really hope that the Services Seta continue to work towards improvements. Correct me if I am wrong here, but I believe that Services Seta have the largest database of providers of all SETAs?
Not easy to please so many providers at all. But if you have good verifiers, a strong pro-active management team and a good IT system then there is hope for sure. Let’s see if any other members picked up the positive change.
Any positive feedback is welcomed (it’s about time, hey?)
1st Mar 2017 at 6:38 am #42864
1st Mar 2017 at 6:42 am #42863
1st Mar 2017 at 6:42 am #42862
Thank you Gill, this is really amazing! So, improvements are being experienced from various providers and individuals – this is such great news. This is how it should be. Okay, I know Rome wasn’t built in one day, but wow, wow, wow – this must be shared with members. Good and positive feedback always makes one feel a little bit better with all the negative discussions, concerns and issues (on a daily basis). Thank you so much Gill, I hope that more positive feedback will be shared – absolutely wonderful news indeed!!
1st Mar 2017 at 6:42 am #42861
1st Mar 2017 at 6:44 am #42860
1st Mar 2017 at 6:55 am #42859
Hi Tessa, that was my exact experience. I am a Verifier, I keep current, as this is important to me. The past couple of months have created such a negative impression which included the Verifiers, but this was clear, that these individuals conducted a quality verification – which I appreciated. There was no way, they could BS me, as I know the requirements, legislation, stipulations, legal requirements and how it should be done. I found these individuals Competent in their Verification, they were professional and did not once step over the line of red tape nonsense, or attempted to have a chip of authority nor aggresive behaviour. This is how it should be done, professional, quality driven, knowledgeable, able to explain or request information in a professional manner and prioritise the importance of verifications – quality validation and evaluation of learner portfolios and achievements!
I would love to attend a verification per SETA (one each) – to see if other SETA Verifiers are conducting these verifications in the correct and professional manner.
1st Mar 2017 at 9:25 am #42858
1st Mar 2017 at 7:04 pm #42857
I went to the Services SETA to ask them some questions on accreditation this afternoon – in regards to what is going to happen with companies accredited against skills programmes, as well as a query on an assessor registration that was turned down.
Their new offices are very good looking, professional and modern.
Their reception was excellent.
I was dealt with within minutes by a lady of the name of Gugu, who “recruited” another staff member to assist, went to call somebody from the assessor department who also arrived with another person in tow.
They were helpful, knowledgeable and I walked out with a smile and solid answers. First time ever.
I was really impressed.
They could not give me an answer on the skills programme accreditation, but did advice me on a plan of action which I will take forward.
What was sad, was the lack of information passed onto them from the QCTO and their own frustration with the new changes happening, while being left out of the loop.
A good SETA day for me.
1st Mar 2017 at 7:07 pm #42856
2nd Mar 2017 at 5:23 am #42855
Hi Jacqueline, thank you for the positive feedback. It seems like they are really trying hard to improve their service delivery to providers.
Regarding the lack of information passed onto the SETA from the QCTO, I find that very strange. In my opinion it seems like the SETAs (well most of them) don’t want to work with the QCTO. I have seen emails from the QCTO to one of the SETAs and the lack of response or should I say ignorance from the SETAs are shocking. The SETAs are informed, but they don’t want to acknowledge or prepare for change (some are gearing up and working with the QCTO and some just don’t). I am sure that this will be resolved soon and they will all work together. The SETAs need to get more involved, and improve on communication skills, then you will see how quickly the negatives turn to positives!
Glad you had a good SETA day, this must be seen more often!
2nd Mar 2017 at 3:52 pm #42854
2nd Mar 2017 at 4:01 pm #42853
Hi Kate, I am going to agree to disagree with that statement. The only reason why Skills Universe is informed better, is that many members have taken the time to read gazettes, government notices and have taken it upon themselves to get the information – Members are pro-active, and so should the SETAs be for their providers. I have seen many notices going to various SETAs, and their ignorance have placed them where they are now – not the other way around.
But in all fairness, each one have their own opinion and resources.
The mere fact that some SETA staff don’t even know about the DHET compulsory application is one reason that stands out like a thorn – it is in the public domain – all they have to do is keep their providers updated, which they are not. There is a hand full of SETAs that are addressing these issues and working with the QCTO and they don’t complain, it is the SETAs that refuse to work with the QCTO whom is blaming the wrong Authority.
2nd Mar 2017 at 4:19 pm #42852
2nd Mar 2017 at 4:22 pm #42851
3rd Mar 2017 at 6:14 am #42850
Hey, hey it’s friday!!!!!! At last, this week was just extra long (not sure why). Let’s get down to business and look at what is important to us. You are well aware that there are continues engagement with the QCTO with regards to the poor service delivery from the majority of SETAs. We have addressed various issues and concerns, which have started the implementation of actions and solutions from the QCTO. I need to draft a response to the QCTO Chief Directors again, after the KZN session which is next week (9th March). In this submission I would like to address issues and concerns that is not satisfactory, however I would also like to include improvements that we are experiencing. Let’s give credit where credit is due.
A nice balance between complaints and compliments would be awesome. So let us look at compliments (not just issues and concerns) and submit this to the QCTO. This will also give the QCTO an indication of how well their implementation and monitoring is progressing. We like progress! So, please do not hold back, let us hear the compliments and servicer improvements that you have experienced!
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.