Request Intervention Minister Gigaba – New Home Affairs Rules Mayo Clinic Physician to be deported

Front Page Looking For… Social Development, Community Building, NPOs & NGOs Request Intervention Minister Gigaba – New Home Affairs Rules Mayo Clinic Physician to be deported

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  sylvia hammond 2 years, 6 months ago.

  • Author
  • #29771

    sylvia hammond

                                                                                   29 June 2015            

    Greetings of Peace

    Dear Recipients

    It is understood that the intention behind the new Home Affairs travel rules are in the interest of combating child trafficking, spouse disappearing with children, etc, but it is important that such rules should take into account individual cases where their is a plausible, credible explanation why documents may not have been carried especially in the first 6 months to a year of the new rule being applied. Lateral thinking by immigration officials in the interest of the tourists and the country is critical.

    Take today’s case in point: an American tourist arrives with her 3 minor children to South Africa this morning and is requested to produce documentation from the husband.  He is a cardiologist at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona.  He accompanied his family to the UK and was traveling to South Africa with them when he got called back urgently to treat a patient from the royal family of one of the Middle Eastern states.  Who at that point will remember unabridged certificates and a police affidavit especially when the children travel extensively throughout the world with one parent with no such complications anywhere else.  

    The wife, Martina Mookadam, is also a physician at the Mayo Clinic, but now she and her 3 children aged 10, 14 and 15 are in a detention centre at OR Tambo to be deported on a flight at 7.20 pm tonight.  This action virtually gives them “criminal” status.  Martina was not allowed to even ask which flight they were being deported on.  She offered to get a stamped letter signed by her husband and sent from a police station in the United States.  It was flatly refused.

    She and her children pay the price because of a sudden change in the husband’s travel plans.  These children are traveling for 48 hours, are exhausted and are now being put back on another long flight back to the UK.  I thought Home Affairs was protecting children.  Great way to treat children.  Great PR for South Africa’s tourism industry when a physician and her cardiologist husband at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona discuss the welcome you can expect at a South African airport.  Their patients would be high profile, potential future tourists to South Africa, people whose spending power can make a meaningful contribution to our economy.

    I call upon Minister Gigaba to intervene timeously and stop the deportation.  He has less than 4 hours to prevent a huge embarrassment to the country.  Thereafter, Home Affairs must go back to the drawing board and relook at how these rules should be applied.  I agree that children must be protected but the new law should have a case by case approach in a humane manner.

    Imtiaz Sooliman

            Please visit our website:                                  

    Not what we give, But what we share, For the gift without the giver Is bare.

                                                   James Russell Lowell



    Share on Social Media
  • #29773

    Tass Schwab

    Thanks for this. It seems criminals are given free passage and innocents are persecuted in SA. Is there a petition? What is the point of posting this here if we cannot help?

    Share on Social Media
  • #29772

    sylvia hammond

    Hi Tass,

    Gift of the Givers do so much good for South Africans generally – and abroad, it seemed wrong not to publish it when they sent through the media briefing.  

    Given the shortness of time I was rather hoping that some of our “connected” members would raise a phone call or two to exert pressure.

    I absolutely agree with the legislation to prevent child trafficking and also one parent removing their child from an estranged spouse, but clearly there are times when circumstances arise that are unusual. Difficult call for the authorities and difficult job to do – for sure.

    Share on Social Media

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Share on Social Media