Advertisement


What impact will the amendments to the EE Act have?

By dessquire, 28 August, 2014

Employment Equity Amendments 2014

Recent changes to the Employment Equity act will have an impact on many employers in some way or other. The main changes seem to indicate that discrimination against women is the main target particularly when it comes to issues of equal pay for equal work.

In terms of section 6 (1) of the act employers must eliminate any unfair discrimination by removing and eliminating any differences in terms and conditions of employment including the remuneration of employees who perform work of equal value. So, if a man is doing the same work (but of equal value) as a woman then both must be paid the same salary. This will also apply in terms of not only gender but also in terms of race and disability.

So what do we mean by equal work? We can only make a comparison here is the employees work for the same employer.

  • The same work as any other employee if the work is identical

  • Substantially the same as the work of another employee if the similarities are such that we can say they are performing the same job even if not identical

  • Is of the same value as the work of another employee assuming the occupations are accorded the same value.

Now this is all very confusing and to say the least and extremely difficult to understand and come to terms with. But don’t worry - a code of good practice will be published eventually. It is up to the employer to show that differences in salaries or income are fair based on fair criteria such as skills, responsibility and experience.

Where equal pay for equal work is concerned it was stated by the EE Director Ntsoaki Mamashela at the recent road shows that the principal of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value applied “irrespective of the status of the employment”. So employees appointed on a contract basis will have the same rights as employees on a full time basis and vice versa.   

The jurisdiction of the CCMA has been extended to deal with disputes related to discrimination in terms of the EE Act. This has been changed from conciliation to conciliating and arbitrating discrimination disputes on condition the claimant earns below the threshold or R205433.33 annually.     

As far as discrimination is concerned the act states that no one may discriminate against an employee in any employment policy or practice on any grounds including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, family responsibility, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability , religion HIV status, conscience, belief, political opinion, culture, language birth or any other arbitrary (random) grounds. Most of this is quite understandable but the arbitrary grounds are going to lead to many instances of litigation I fear. One are that might be worthy of consideration is the appointment of part time or temporary workers to full time positions where the issue of equal pay for equal work will kick in. This may well become one of the many arbitrary grounds employers will have to contend with.

Another change is where an employee take action against an employer claiming unfair discrimination on grounds as listed in section 6 then the onus is on the employee to prove his or her case based on the balance of probability.

When assessing work of equal value all jobs should be assessed taking into account

  • Responsibility demands of the job – people, finances and resources

  • Skills, qualifications, prior learning and experience required in order to do the job

  • Physical, emotional and mental effort required to perform

  • Conditions under which the work is performed

Other conditions may be taken into consideration in evaluating the value of work provided the relevance can be verified. In conducting an assessment in terms of the points above it will be necessary to ensure there is no bias based on discriminatory factors such as race, gender and disability. Sectoral determinations previously agreed to by the minister may be used as a means of justifying the value.

Other areas that may be considered in justifying differences in terms and conditions include

  • Length of service and seniority

  • Qualifications, ability, competence or potential which is above the minimum level  required to perform the job

  • Performance of employees based on fair performance assessment fairly applied

  • Demotion following restructuring or other legitimate reasons without a reduction in pay. The salary may be fixed until such time as other employees doing the same job reach the same level.

  • Temporary positions in order to gain experience or training

  • Where a shortage of skills exists

The changes outlined will need to be considered carefully and will lead to a need to revise current policies and job profiles. In particular requirements related to job profiles in terms of competencies will need to be considered carefully to allow for experience and recognition of prior learning. The RPL implications in terms of equal pay for equal work will need to be considered very carefully and thoroughly investigated in terms of long term and short term impact.  

The EE Act and the potential changes to the BCEA calls for caution. Everything taking place is intended to bring about equality in terms of the individuals rights as set out in the constitution. The amendments have been promulgated to further prohibit unfair discrimination against employees and to enforce compliance by employers. Now is the time for affirmative action.        

Des Squire (Managing member)

AMSI and Associates cc

[email protected]


Advertisement



Copyright: Portal Publishing (Pty)Ltd | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Skills Portal | Careers Portal | Jobs Portal | Bursaries Portal | Skills Universe
About us | Contact us
Portal PublishingPress Council